READ the Best of Portfolio, featuring a selection of the best published work from Portfolio students.

KEEP UP with journalists' beats in Blogfolio, updated throughout the day.

  • Read more about Portfolio

  • See sample portfolio proposals

  • Application information

  • Video of guest speakers and Master Classes (requires RealPlayer)

    Search for talent

    « BACK to Matthew Fishbane's portfolio

    Posted 09.04.07
    More from
    Attack of the nameologists, a Q&A with Rebecca Gomperts of Women on Waves, and a new president for India

    Click on the links to the right for originals and more of my archive.


    For now, the baby's name is "Baby"

    Originally published on June 22, 2007

    Call me Shiloh. A Friday piece in the WSJ's Weekend Journal cracks open past and present baby-naming trends, including the marketing of "Mary," the selling of "Sally" and the history of baby names like "Notwithstanding" (which -- its biblical source notwithstanding -- must be a doozy of a first name to bear). The feature also clocks the explosion of an industry, exploring the many ways a coterie of name mavens are both fueling and quelling "unprecedented levels of angst amongst parents trying to choose names for their children."

    These self-described "nameologists," numerologists, sociologists, astrologers, consultants, writers and webmasters are all cashing in on parents' urge to give newborns a leg up any way they can, including agonizing over the most auspicious moniker. But the baby-naming industry is also cranking up the pressure to avoid screwing up your kid's name. Want to avoid the fate of a mother who Googled her chosen baby name only to find it taken by a British porn star? Look no further: Amazon alone offers 323 baby-naming books (a bounty that might trouble already indecisive parents), while a name page on warns, "you'll want the perfect name for embroidering on blankets... and cooing softly in baby's ear. And, of course, for hollering at the top of your lungs when sweet baby reaches puberty."

    We expect to see the first name-middle name combo "Getoverhere Rightnow" start climbing the Social Security charts any day now.


    The pro-choice pirate

    Originally published on July 20, 2007

    Rebecca Gomperts, founder of the pro-choice activist group Women on Waves, has been labeled a "pirate," a "cowboy doctor" (and in need of "some psychiatric help" by an Irish antiabortion group). Since 2001 her Netherlands-based nonprofit, Women on Waves, has operated a mobile clinic on a ship that sails to countries where abortion is illegal -- and while the organization has attracted plenty of critics along the way, it has also been recognized for helping advance women's reproductive freedom across the globe, most recently by lobbying to bring about legalized abortion in Portugal. With a woman dying from an illegal abortion every six minutes, according to the group's estimate, and abortion laws growing ever more politicized, is direct action, like that taken by Women on Waves, the new activist frontier? We called the captain of the "abortion boat" at her Amsterdam office to test the waters.

    Just this week, Portugal legalized abortion within the first 10 weeks of pregnancy. You went to Portugal in 2004. Where will Women on Waves be sailing next?

    We hope to sail again within a half a year, but I cannot tell where exactly we plan to go. We would love to go to South America. There are a lot of changes happening there now, with Mexico City legalizing abortion, and Colombia too, and we'd also be very interested in going to Argentina. We have to see if we can pull it off. The obstacles in front of us have been growing and growing since we first sailed in 2001 [to Ireland].

    So your success has actually made your work more difficult?

    Well, sometimes you have to change strategies. We're just a very small group of people. We're still struggling with the Dutch government. We have to go to court again because we have a license that is so restrictive that we cannot really work with it. Basically, we work in a loophole of the Dutch law, which means we can only do abortions up to six and a half weeks of pregnancy. But the fundamentalist Christian government proposed to change the law so that these early abortions will also fall under license requirements. And they want us to have a contract with a hospital wherever we plan to sail, among other requirements. So we will not be able to work anymore if the law goes through.

    But in 2004, when we sailed to Portugal, our minister of foreign affairs had to intervene because the Portuguese government stopped us with warships. So our campaigns still have an effect on a governmental level.

    We are also looking at the possibility of getting a ship registered in another country, but because [abortion] has such a political effect, you have to know who the supportive and unsupportive politicians are, to be able to inform the supportive ones to make sure that people are also well informed. And that always requires a lot of work. We have done that work already in the Netherlands. But if you go to another country, you have to understand the whole political landscape again in a different context. Abortion may be fundamentally a health issue but it's so politicized that we cannot ignore politics.

    No matter where you go?

    American antiabortion groups are exporting their antiabortion rhetoric and campaigns all over the world. So it doesn't matter where you go, it becomes an issue.

    What is Women on Waves working on these days?

    Our main activity is guiding women through e-mail, telephone and online about doing safe abortions themselves. In the U.S. we don't know how things will turn out with the new high court. But I think we will see that more and more states will get more and more restrictive with abortion laws -- and that women will indeed resort to doing abortions themselves at home, with mifepristone. It can be done safely -- as long as the women have the proper information.


    India to swear in first female prez

    Originally published on July 24, 2007

    The swearing in tomorrow of India's first female president, 72-year-old Pratibha Patil, will not be the first occasion India has used its largely ceremonial post to offer underrepresented groups a voice. But while there's a lot to celebrate about the election of a woman in a nation where gender discrimination remains (according to recent reports) "bitter," "deep-rooted" and "widespread," it remains unclear whether Patil's victory will bring significant changes to the daily lives of her countrywomen.

    Patil is a former governor and member of the Indian Parliament whose political career began four years before Indira Gandhi was elected prime minister in 1966. Last week, she won nearly two-thirds of the country's votes after what had been an especially acrimonious campaign. Still, Patil faces lingering accusations of trying to shield family members from police investigations and scorn from Muslim leaders who denounced her call to women to abandon wearing headscarves.

    And although we're usually optimistic, Patil has us asking once again -- just as Nefertiti's Egyptian subjects may have more than 3,000 years ago -- whether female leaders necessarily help make female lives better. Will her example widen the role of women in South Asian politics? Will watching the brass of the world's fourth-largest armed forces greet a woman as their commander in chief be a powerful enough symbol to dissuade Indian families from aborting female fetuses out of preference for sons? More to the point, what effect -- if any -- will having a female leader make on the issues of gender equality in her country?

  • Baby names
  • Gomperts
  • Harry Potter!
  • TV Daily
  • Boob Tube
  • Patil