Any website which is run as a business relies on advertising to sustain itself, as do 99% of newspapers and magazines. These adverts are normally on every page, though it is clear that there is a market for non-intrusive online advertising as the success of Google's Gmail and it's discrete, "targeted" sideline banners would testify.
So what with all these fancy, flashing, attention-grabbing advertising banners on news source websites (and CNN even has short video clip advertising if you select the "view story" option), it seems the tabloid headline, typically lurid and eye-catching, will be phased out, as an extraneous diversion for the online reader.
Ryan McConnell @ October 6, 2005 - 9:51pm
Hey WIllem.... The flashy ads are annoying, but, from my experience in the advertising industry, they do actually work (in terms of more people interacting with them, etc). At least compared to a lot of other forms of Internet ads...
The puzzling thing for me is how has the newspaper industry's advertising model sustained itself over the years and why hasn't the Internet been able to replicate its success? What did newspaper ads do to convince brand managers to invest millions of dollars with them, and why can't the Internet do the same thing? Is there any way that Internet websites could do that would manage to sell their products and not annoy people like you and me?
»