Today, two stories appeared, one after the other, in the Poynter Institute's newsroom digest Romanesko. The first was an account of the continuing internal conflict at the Miami Herald after the firing of two journalists over their appearances on Radio and TV Marti. The issue, which has been nailed not only by the Herald and other voices in print media but by other j-students writing here, is decidedly that the journalists should not have taken money from the government via Radio/TV Marti to disseminate propaganda.
Next on the Romanesko page was a story in the Hartford Courant about how the Courant's Washington bureau chief no longer appearing as a panelist on Voice of America, a job for which he received $100 per appearance. That is the worst that will happen to David Lightman. He will not lose his job or much of his credibility as a reporter, despite the fact that he, like the Nuevo Herald reporters, got paid by the government to talk on the radio. The Courant article specifically notes that "in recent years, the Bush administration has become particularly aggressive in promoting its policies through the news media."
Hmm, you mean there's a propaganda machine here, too?
So why does a Connecticut paper's bureau chief get a slap on the wrist while the Miami journalists get fired? Shouldn't it be worse, not better, that the Courant chief is higher up on the management ladder?
Is it that we inside the U.S. can't come to terms with the fact that our government produces propaganda meant for us too? Is VoA not propaganda the way its Cuban counterpart is?
Enough with the rhetorical questions. It's not as if the hypocrites making decisions like these will notice, anyway.
Todd Watson @ September 19, 2006 - 12:08am
Sure, its all propaganda. Radio Free Europe, Voice of America, the Office of Cuba Broadcasting - all responsible for the production of explicit propaganda. The only difference is the context. Radio Free Europe was profoundly appreciated by millions of people trapped behind the Iron Curtain. But R.F.E. was essentially a propaganda machine. Good or bad is a contextual judgement.
»