After googling the term ‘media bias’, which provided fodder for a previous blog, I stumbled across the Media Resource Center, a self-described conservative watchdog group. Scrolling through the site, I noticed a plug for something called Times Watch:
“dedicated to documenting and exposing the liberal political agenda of the New York Times.â€
So I clicked on it. The first story that popped up was titled ‘Hugo Chavez, Latino Male Oprah?’ and appeared to be more of a diatribe than a liberal bias expose. The piece began:
“Many Americans may have been outraged or just perplexed by Venezuelan strongman Hugo Chavez’s attack on President Bush as "the devil," but the New York Times saw Chavez’s plug for a Noam Chomsky book [Hegemony or Survival: America’s Quest for Global Dominance] as a light front-page feature on Saturday – he’s apparently a Latino male Oprah.â€
The author of the piece, Tim Graham, seemed to misinterpret a reference to Chavez’s “stature†and took issue with the Times article calling Chomsky “a darling of the left.†He continued:
“Chomsky’s theories are never seriously challenged in the article, and no conservative is quoted.â€
Graham is correct in that The Times did not delve into Chomsky’s politics within the article. (The article was about the increasing sales of ‘Hegemony or Survival’. A book review had already ran in the Times two years earlier.) Instead, the Times quoted a Chomsky critic, Alan Dershowitz, who assailed Chomsky’s writing prowess and basically called his work unreadable.
The only fairness I observed in the Times Watch piece was to concede that Samantha Power, who wrote a review of the book in 2004, presented a critical view of the book. She was quoted describing ‘Hegemony and Survival’ as:
“a raging and often meandering assault on United States foreign policy.â€
These are hardly words of praise. Power’s quote coupled with Dershowitz’s criticism, seemed to balance out the Times story. I was unable to detect the apparent liberal media bias Times readers were subjected to.
I believe that any bias in the media is detrimental for journalists, readers, and society as a whole. (Although I also believe it is unavoidable.) Yet, I think that organizations like Media Research Center (which includes Times Watch) often find themselves crowing over a bias that isn’t there. In fact, by writing these articles and posting them on their sites, they appear to create bias (albeit a conservative one in the case of the Media Research Center). I thought bias was what they proclaimed they were opposed to in the first place.
Nadia Taha @ September 27, 2006 - 8:05pm
It's not remarkable that MRC criticized the Times for failing to represent a conservative criticism of the book. Dershowitz put down Chomsky's work, but there was no clever jab from the right, just a below the belt scoolyard hurling of insults. For the record, here's the part of the article that quotes Alan Dershowitz:
What a thoroughly unintelligent and hyperbolic way to characterize Chomsky's writings. This is not a conservative criticism, but rather a shallow claim about Chomsky's unpopularity, and a waste of print space on the part of the Times.
Also, when I read the "darling of the left" description, I thought it was condescending, not endearing.
»