Rate My Professor

Wired.com ‘s Joanna Glasner raised an interesting question in her article today:

Do college faculty members have a case if they sue popular website RateMyProfessors.com?

Professors don’t seem to like it much:

"By and large, RateMyProfessors is unmentionable in university administrations," said Kenneth Westhues, a sociology professor at the University of Waterloo who completed a study of the rating site last year. "Many professors won't even admit that they look at their ratings on the website."

(As an aside, I did have one professor in undergrad who mentioned that he never looked at his ratings, but his kids did. They thought it was hilarious.)

Westhues, however, thinks the website provides a valuable service:

"Here's this tenured professor with high rank and high salary and students say he's a disaster in the classroom," he said. "RateMyProfessors gets that information out into the open."

There’s a downside, though:

"Anyone can contribute ratings, whether they know how to rate someone effectively or not and whether they are enrolled in the class or not," said Chet Robie, associate professor of management and organizational behavior at Wilfrid Laurier University.

At his university, Robie said he and many of his colleagues suspect that one faculty member has been doctoring colleagues ratings to make his or her own appear more favorable. Across RateMyProfessors, he believes there is more than enough defamatory material to launch a class action suit against the site and the people posting the offensive comments.

So, on one side, we have free speech, opinion, and perhaps even truth. On the other side, falsified ratings, potentially damaged careers, and perhaps defamation.

The posts are closely monitored for obscenity, and multiple posts from the same user are eliminated. When a professor gets a lot of attention, it’s generally more positive than negative, according to one site administrator.

So, given the context of the article and the class, I did the natural thing: I looked up wired.com’s own – and our class’s own – Professor Adam Penenberg.

Nothing. He’s not even on the list. For the record, blogger Jay Rosen is on the list, but has no ratings.

Professors and schools probably will sue RateMyProfessors eventually. They may get a settlement, they may even shut the site down. But I don’t think they have much of a case. The site is place for students to trade opinions with each other of people who – to them, at least – are public figures. And in my experience, the professors with the worst ratings teach required courses, so attendance in their classes is pretty much guaranteed. These professors also tend to get chili peppers indicating that they are “hot” (some ironic, some earnest).

And even NYU President John Sexton got a 5 rating for his honors seminar. No chili pepper, though. Scandalous.

Anonymous (not verified) @ January 9, 2006 - 11:07pm

Yet you expect professors to respect all students, even ones who perform poorly?

Anonymous (not verified) @ January 10, 2006 - 8:25pm

I expect them to do the job they are paid to do and do it well. Duh!

Anonymous (not verified) @ January 10, 2006 - 11:47pm

So is it the job of a Professor to respect bad students? Yes or no.

Anonymous (not verified) @ January 5, 2006 - 12:29am

The problem with RMP is the cruel and mean-spirited comments made by students for a variety of reasons. If the comments focused on the teaching skills of professors it would be far more valuable. However to suggest (for example) that a teacher looks like a cartoon figure and sounds funny is not a commentary on his/her teaching skill nor does it provide any help in choosing a professor. Make the site more useful by encouraging posts that are directed to providing valuable information because even tho many readers will disregard childish comments others may not and therefore represents a waste of time.

Anonymous (not verified) @ January 10, 2006 - 8:27pm

Anyone with a brain ignores such comments, so in the end are meaningless, except to insecure professors who know deep down they do not belong in a teaching job, yet aren't mature enough to admit it and remove themselves from the school.

Anonymous (not verified) @ January 11, 2006 - 12:00am

Just like the only students that post on RMP are insecure and know deep down that they don't belong in college, yet aren't mature enough to admit it and drop out in order to pursue a fascinating career at Burger King?

Anonymous (not verified) @ January 11, 2006 - 9:47am

This is the best site ever. It gives you an outlet for recommending a great teacher or warning against a bad one. Its especially useful if you are not very good in a certain subject and need a better teacher than the norm. In my case I have to seek out my math teachers because I'm not naturally gifted in the subject. It's important to let everyone know that I'm not looking for an easy class. I'm looking for a class where I get my moneys worth, thats all, especially when it concerns my major. I've seen the good,bad and the ugly. The ugly should not be rewarded by having good students waste their time in their classes.I will be talking to other students about this site so that they too can make informed decisions about their professors.

Anonymous (not verified) @ January 11, 2006 - 3:05pm

Re: the fact that a plumber or a policeman is not evaluated by their customers comment that was placed on December 6, 2006. If your toilet was still overflowing like your mouth when the job was bought and paid for, I think you would have an evaluation that would be more important to you than the product of bad professors. Yes, they exist, along with bad plumbers, I am glad there is a website to take a look at, and see others opinions. They deserve to be evaluated by the students. And by the way, without plumbers and policeman, you couldn't have the privilege of having a professor. Have you ever heard of plague, or crime?

Anonymous (not verified) @ January 13, 2006 - 12:43pm

Faculty are not public persons but employees. Classrooms are not open to the public nor do faculty - in the course of their teaching - broadcast to the public.

Grades are not the same thing as ratings. Grades are private and students must give consent to their release. Providing grades to a prospective employer is not the same thing as grades being put on a website for the world to peruse.

In fact, there are strict privacy guidelines governing this. Actually they don't relate to the grades so much as the identity of the student.

It is illegal to broadcast and identify students and their grades.

Student ratings of faculty are not grades but opinions about aspects of faculty members that may or may not have any relevance to their teaching. The criteria students use may well be a sober examination and reflection but I suspect it's flimsy and whimsy. Complaining of boredom or having to actually perform work or determining a course as a waste of time aren't really useful unless you regard a college classroom as little more than an interactive and live form of television.

In fact, the expectations of many tudents are wildly unrealistic. There's a lot pressures of students and faculty which actually get in the way of education. College classrooms are designed to be entertaining stages or literal stepping stones to a job.

College faculty are typically evaluated though the content of those evaulations isn't made public. And faculty - certainly untenured and adjunct ones - are held accountable. To be sure, students can't hound a professor out of the profession because they find the person boring. And professors can't run a student out of the university just because they find this person a blitering idiot.

For those who employment (not personalities) are insecure, ratemyprofessor can potentially result in some pretty capricious hiring or employment decisions.

Ultimately, the reliability and validity of the scores at a public place like ratemyprofessor render it little more than a convenient way to vent. But rating professors only worsens the situation by institutionalizing ridicule while elevating to central importance criteria that largely celebrate superficiality.

Recent comments

Navigation

Syndicate

Syndicate content