United 93: Is It Too Soon?

There has been so much commotion about the upcoming film, United 93. The family members of the deceased have given the filmmakers their consent, yet some people say it’s too soon. Frankly, I can’t say I’m entirely opposed to the film.

Sure, it’s true that when I see the Twin Towers in the background of movies made before the attacks I get a weird feeling in my stomach.But 9/11 is a reality, one we face every day, and one we will deal with for the rest of our lives. Nevertheless, the arguments that it is too soon to make such a film are, in my opinion, irrelevant. When will we know when the time is right? Should a movie be made when this generation has died, so it won’t hurt as much? What about Holocaust movies and the countless others that have been based on atrocities committed in the past?

I personally have not been able to watch documentaries about the events on 9/11 because they hit too close to home for me. Nevertheless, that has been MY choice—these documentaries have been available for anyone with or without cable to watch, and whether they’ve chosen to watch them or not is their business, and I believe that’s what it comes down to with regards to the film; watch it if you dare, and if you don’t agree with it ... don’t watch it!

And for those who say it’s wrong to make money off something like this, all I can say is: If Greengrass and his crew don’t make money on it now, eventually someone else will—it’s inevitable.

Ivan Pereira @ Wed, 04/05/2006 - 11:05am

For me the big problem about 9/11 movies is not only the fact that the tragedy is so recent, but because it is unresolved. We know who brought down the planes, but they are still on the loose. Even though it is evident that Sadham and his governement were not directly involved with the attacks, 9/11 occasionally pops into my head whenever I see news footage of the Iraq war, becuase it was indirefctly caused by it.

A similar thing happened with John F. Kennedy's assassination, and the only good film to come out of that was Oliver Stone's JFK. It worked well becuase it focused on the aftermath and invisetigation of the assassination, which not too many people know about. At this stage of history, it would be best if future filmakers make their fictional 9/11 movies in this fashion as it is something that all can learn from without being too upset.

Andrew Nusca @ Wed, 04/05/2006 - 1:08pm

Actually, everyone who brought down the planes is dead. When they crashed. Most of everyone else has been apprehended. The reality is, we haven't arrested the top dog of the whole plan - but he's more a symbol than anything else.

Ivan Pereira @ Wed, 04/05/2006 - 2:53pm

Good observation Andrew, but the my main point still stands: The tragedy September 11th is not yet resolved and becuase of this it is difficult to crreate a realistic fiction story about it without upseting audiences.

Julia Song @ Wed, 04/05/2006 - 12:31pm

I agree with Rebecca. It is up to the viewers to decide whether or not they find the movie offensive or hurting. Ivan mentioned that only one good movie came out of JFK's assassination, but that also is a personal, subjective evaluation. Rebecca said this was inevitable, and I agree. And if someone doesn't like the specific way the movie is made, I'm sure someone else will try to make it to attract the viewers that turn away from this movie. I agree with Ivan that this tragedy hasn't been resolved, and this may be problem for some people. But will it ever be resolved? When or how will we know? How would we know if it would be resolved by the time next movie comes out?

Anonymous (not verified) @ Wed, 04/05/2006 - 1:42pm

Ivan you constantly make spelling errors, for the love of God please learn how to type.

Ivan Pereira @ Wed, 04/05/2006 - 2:44pm

oops sorry about that

Dan Smith @ Wed, 04/05/2006 - 5:11pm

Helpful hint: when criticizing spelling and/or grammar, make sure your criticism itself is a proper sentence of English.

Anonymous (not verified) @ Tue, 04/18/2006 - 1:19pm

You've got to be kidding.

Adam Raymond @ Wed, 04/05/2006 - 4:20pm

Why does the movie have to be about resolution? Can't it just be about the time in the air? That can make for a compelling movie. Of course, this thing looks like poop, so, you be the judge.

About

A group blog exploring our media world. Produced by the Digital Journalism: Blogging course at New York University, Spring 2007.

Recent comments

Syndicate

Syndicate content

Navigation