e-mail us who we are home

Thirty Years Later: Title IX Still Controversial
by Matt Sedensky

Equal Opportunity Coaching
by Allison Steele

The New Female Athlete
by Margarita Bertsos

Overtraining and Undereating
by Falasten Abdeljabbar

Playing Like a Girl
by Sasha Stumacher

Women's Tennis: The Marketing Model
by Daniel Mitha

Who Gets The Ball?
by Anne-Marie Harold

Selling Skin
by Suzanne Rozdeba

SlamJam and the Future
by Mike Gorman

Playing out Identity
by Maya Jex




PAGE 2: A Victory for Women's Sports

Signed into law by President Nixon in 1972, as the women’s rights movement gained momentum, Title IX prohibited sex discrimination in all educational institutions receiving any federal financial assistance. By and large, then, Title IX affects all two- and four-year colleges, since virtually all post-secondary schools have students who receive federal student loans or other federally funded financial assistance. It also applies to high schools and grade schools.

Title IX was "not nirvana, but it certainly was a milestone."

 

The bulk of the legislation targeted sex discrimination in university admissions, but its application to intercollegiate athletics is the aspect of Title IX that gets the most attention today. "The most important impact has been opening the doors of admission offices to girls and women," said Mary Turco, a Dartmouth College professor specializing in Title IX.

Dr. Shirley McCune, one of Title IX's original drafters, added,
"Athletics is only a part of the whole issue of equity. It’s an important part, but it’s only one part." Title IX was "not nirvana," she said, "but it certainly was a milestone."

But while athletics is just one part of Title IX, it is the pa
rt that university administrators have still not mastered in the last 30 years. While admissions and financial aid standards have largely erased sexism – women now make up a majority of college undergraduates – intercollegiate athletics are not yet on a level playing field.

To understand why, Title IX’s history is important to recount. On May 27, 1975, three years after passage of the legislation, the final regulations for Title IX were signed, giving colleges three years, until 1978, to comply with its guidelines in one of three ways.

The first – and most controversial – is "substantial proportionality," when sports participation rates among both men and women at a given college mirror enrollment statistics. That is to say, if 45 percent of students at a college are women, then 45 percent of the athletes should be as well.

The second, known as "history and continuing practice", is satisfied when a university has a history and continuing practice of expanding athletic programs in line with the interests and
abilities of the underrepresented sex.

And the third, "effectively accommodating interests and abilities," is satisfied when a college makes solid attempts to meet the interests and abilities of females even when there is a disproportionately smaller number of them participating in sports when compared to males at the school. Colleges only need to meet one of these three "prongs" in order to be in compliance with Title IX.

"We took the language from Title VII, which dealt with race, and changed it for sex," McCune explained. "Then we had our real problem, because no one knew what it meant."

In order to deal with this ignorance, McCune said five procedural requirements were put in place to help colleges to understand the scope of the law. Universities evaluated themselves on the issue of gender inequities. Administrators drafted new policies, instituted grievance procedures, and notified parents of the college’s non-discrimination stance. And efforts were made to train faculty in the law’s provisions and effects.

"It wasn’t until Title IX that women’s sports were even considered legitimate," McCune said. "There’s no question that we’ve moved tremendously in terms of improving the total life value of women. Women can do things now that they never could have before."

And whether or not compliance with Title IX is responsible, an analysis of NCAA data seems to suggest McCune is right – women have come a long way in the last three decades.

Between 1981, the first year the NCAA started recording participation statistics, and 1999, the number of women athletes on college campuses increased by over 126 percent. In the same period, men’s participation in sports grew by about 24 percent, the data shows. Today, about 5.5 percent of full-time undergraduate women participate in intercollegiate athletics, compared with about 1.7 percent in 1972. The number of men has fallen from about 10.4 percent at Title IX’s passage to about 9.5 percent today.

NEXT: CHANGING SOCIETY'S GAME FACE >>




PAGE 1: Thirty Years Later: Title IX Still Controversial >>

>> PAGE 2: A Victory for Women's Sports

PAGE 3: Changing Society's Game Face >>

PAGE 4: Hits, But No Homeruns >>

PAGE 5: Men Call Time-Out >>

PAGE 6: Sidelines with a New Look >>

PAGE 7: Huddling for Reform >>


U.S. Department of Education Report
Read about the history, achievements and future of Title IX.

NCAA Title IX Resource Center
Download a gender equity manual and related documents. Link to more resources.

Women's Sports Foundation
Access dozens of articles about gender equity and obtain official foundation positions.

A Hero for Daisy
Read reviews of the documentary based on two-time Olympian Chris Ernst.

Yale Daily News
In 1972, Title IX's passage opened new doors for female athletes. Twenty-five years later, the question remains: Has the playing field been leveled?









                                                           Home | About Us | Contact Us
                                                          Photos from the Image Bank