WHO GETS THE BALL?
Race and Opportunity in Women's Basketball
by Anne-Marie Harold
Produced for the Web by Churchill Otieno
Her long
hair hung in plaits; at this game, she sported cornrows. The
inner part of her right forearm revealed the beginnings of
what would be an intricate banded tattoo, a basketball woven
into the design. On the court, she wore her shorts street-style,
a couple of inches below the knee. A sports bra hidden beneath
her jersey left toned shoulders and defined arms free to dribble,
steal and shoot. The unofficial uniform meant one thing: this
girl played ball.
Samantha Harter so impressed Janice Quinn with her cocky
confidence and fancy ball-handling that New York University's
head basketball coach awarded the girl from Jersey a starting
position her freshman year. Now a sophomore, Harter has
spent the last year "red-shirted" due to a torn ligament
she suffered partway through that first season. Despite
being benched, the 20-year-old Harter is far from sitting
still.
As one of the only white girls to play at "the Cage,"
West Fourth Street's legendary streetball courts, Harter
does get her share of attention. "People mention it [race]
all the time. They'll call me 'Whitebread' or if I'm doing
really well that day, 'Wonderbread'," she said with a roll
of her eyes.
The attention players like Harter and, at the national
level, NBA Sacramento star Jason Williams attract -- he's
been dubbed everything from "White Chocolate" to "Thrilla
Vanilla" -- is obviously colored by race. In Harter's case,
she's a girl from upscale, semi-rural Hunterdon County in
the northwest part of the state, playing in a style she's
not supposed to know. She loves the rougher, more aggressive
form of basketball that is played at the Cage, where she's
forced to prove herself again and again, primarily against
men.
Thirty years after Title IX, organized basketball programs
at the high school and college level abound for women. For
the past 23 years, basketball has maintained its position
as the most frequently offered sport for women at the college
level, according to Women in Intercollegiate Sport,
a Brooklyn College study completed last year. College programs
today boast years of NCAA championships and titles, and
beyond the collegiate experience, the WNBA now offers the
chance for a professional career in the United States. Little
girls of all colors, rich and poor, all over the nation,
are picking up basketballs.
"They'll
call me 'Whitebread' ... 'Wonderbread'" |
If the battle for gender equality is not yet won, at least
it is within shooting distance and that, ironically, allows
female athletes for the first time to notice the internal
divisions that have riddled the men's leagues all along.
Issues of differences in background and opportunity confront
players on and off the court. As teammates, they share their
love for the game, but that may be all they share. In a
team sport like basketball, a key to success is the ability
to work together and overcome differences, so the court
becomes an intriguing arena in which to watch race relations
play out.
On the basketball court, these differences: socioeconomic,
racial, cultural, environmental -- however they're labeled
– are often symbolized in style of play. The often-offensive
stereotypes? White girls shoot the three-pointer; black
girls can jump. White girls are fundamental, they run technical
plays; black girls play ball, freestyle and flashy. White
girls are thinking, cautious players; black girls are "natural"
athletes, who play harder and work on instinct. Harter,
her straight blonde hair tucked behind her ears, easily
lets the air out of that ball.
"I’d rather rebound and hit people," she starts in an effort
to explain what it takes to stay in a game of streetball.
"People are intimidated by me when I walk onto the court,"
she said, describing the thug-like image she attempts to
project in game warm-ups.
 |
Whose
Ball?
|
Photo Courtesy
ArtToday.com |
Since she was 12, Harter has been a fan of Allen Iverson,
the flamboyant 76er guard she admired since his college
basketball debut as a freshman at Georgetown.
Harter said playing on the street gives her a sense of
freedom and self-assurance, a sensation very different from
playing college ball for NYU. "I don't feel as liberal when
I'm playing through an organized team," she said. "When
I play streetball, I'm just trying to make myself happy,"
and in that Harter finds the freedom to try the riskier
shot or go for the foul.
In organized ball, you're left with the tried and true,
Harter explained, bringing light to the use of the term
"fundamentals" to describe that playing style. To try the
risky move is to step outside of the responsibility that
playing as a team demands, and it's the weight of that responsibility
on the college court that often shakes that confidence she
so freely exudes in the park. This elusive mixture of attitude
and image that Harter speaks of, she says, can make or break
a game. And that’s exactly what happened this year in the
fourth round of the Division III NCAA March Madness playoffs
when NYU faced Emmanuel College of Boston. Emmanuel’s team,
like NYU’s, is racially diverse but has the distinction
of being dominated by small, quick players. Harter watched
from the sidelines, mentally playing along with her fellow
Violets.
From the beginning, the Violets were shaken. They lost
their mental edge early on. They seemed to take few shots
and were down the entire game until the last minute of regulation
playing time when they managed to tie the score at 62-62.
Perhaps it was the cocky swagger of Emmanuel's point guard,
Marcy Tillman, or her victory dance after making an almost
half-court three-pointer. Maybe it was the tattoo and cornrows.
Harter saw it. "She [Tillman] gave off an image that she
was better than she was: the way she carried herself, I
was like, she must be an Iverson fan -- that attitude that's
just 'knowing I'm the best person on the court and letting
everyone else know, whether or not I really am.'"
But that shouldn't have meant a loss for NYU, Harter explained.
"One or two people got blocked and then nobody wanted to
shoot. They were really hesitant." It was this intimidation
which Harter thought spelled the demise of the Violets that
night, when, with 18.8 seconds left in overtime, Emmanuel
hit a two-pointer, ending the game with two clean foul shots.
The buzzer sang and the score was 74-70.
For teammate Vallene Hendersen, a junior from Amityville,
Long Island, the scene was bad deja vu. Hendersen, one of
the five African-American players on the NYU team, sensed
the intimidation her white teammates were feeling. It reminded
her of when the Violets played Savannah Georgia's School
of Arts and Design, an all-black team quick with their game
and their jumpshots. She said that in an effort to "psyche"
up the team, Coach Quinn had played on stereotypes, noting
how athletic the opponents were, how they could "jump out
the roof, basically the black stereotypes of describing
a player," Hendersen said. But the talk intimidated more
than it inspired and with the game hardly underway, the
Violets were down 17-1. Calling a time out, Coach Quinn
quickly called her five African-American players from the
bench. In no time, Hendersen said, "we blew them out."
Richard E. Lapchick, founder of Northeastern University’s
Center for the Study of Sport in Society, gave this phenomenon
some context. Pointing to the entrenched segregation of
public schools, Lapchick emphasized that for many students,
the college arena is their first experience with peers of
many different backgrounds. Race, he said, "is going to
have an effect on a team and assuming it's a multi-racial
team, it can be positioned as a kind of model for the rest
of the school."
Considered to be the most diverse team in their conference
(UAA), NYU is often touted as what Lapchick describes as
a "model of diversity," in background, color, and versatility
in styles of play. Within the team, there seemed few problematic
divisions. And yet, while the team repeatedly emphasized
that race was a "non-issue," race had undoubtedly played
a part in that game.
NEXT:
The Professional Arena: A New Model? Or Perhaps Not >>
|