Reality TV Beats Reality (at Least in Ratings)

Since when does staged competition make for better television than actual competition? I was reading a New York Post article about dismal ratings for NBC’s Olympics coverage compared to other TV shows. And although I couldn’t find an online link to the article, I found a similar article called "American Idol" steals Olympic gold in TV ratings from Muzi.com.

American Idol is a singing competition. The winner is granted a recording contract – the twist is they’re elected by the mass public. Or more appropriately, Verizon text message users. The process isn’t as democratic as it might be billed, and lets face it, how many artists get signed by the power of average Joes on the street than by company execs?

Survivor will have you believe relay races are essential to your survival in the wilderness. Bravo’s Project Runway will have you believe a dress made of cornhusks is the next vogue fashion.

Reality shows put people in non-realistic situations, perhaps to heighten competition. English 101 tells you competition equals conflict which equals drama. But it’s disconcerting that people find created drama from so called “reality shows” more poignant that actual reality. Wasn’t Michelle Kwan’s withdrawal from the Olympic Games enough?

Zack Barangan @ Tue, 02/21/2006 - 10:22pm

See, it bothers me that the most compelling thing about the Winter Olympics thus far has been an athletes' non-participation. The Olympics I remember from my childhood (Lillehammer was the first one I remember watching) were regal, grandiose sporting events where the world's premiere athletes competed to win the gold. Now, it just seems like a glorified World championships. For example, many hockey players (the NHL's current 'phenom' Sidney Crosby included) have opted to take the three week break in their season rather than go represent their countries in the Olympic games. See? Even the athletes don't care that much about the games. (That may be because they don't get paid but that's a different story.)

And of course American Idol beats out the Olympics, American Idol is live every night (not that I would know), while any tech-savvy person could just go to any sports website and see the results of a particular Olympic event before it's even televised.

Adam Raymond @ Tue, 02/21/2006 - 10:25pm

You give me half naked people on the beach or teenagers making fools out of themselves in front of Simon Cowell or cat fighting on the runway and I'll take it over speed skating any day. People are comfortable and familiar with these reality shows. The Olympics come around once every four years. It may be unfortunate that Americans are more interested in faux competition, but I can't blame them.

Rebecca E. Ruiz @ Wed, 02/22/2006 - 2:59pm

I must admit, I agree with Adam. What are people going to be talking about tomorrow, that weird sport where this disk thing is pushed across the ice and all the team does is scream, and you don't even know how the scoring works, or who you think will make it to the next round in American Idol? What song you liked, who made a funny face, and how horrible Paula's hairdo was!

In the end, both the Olympics and American Idol are about fulfilling dreams. And while American Idol is, in fact, "staged," these are people that without the show would never have a chance at fame. Olympians don't really care or need me to watch, because the Olympics will never be cancelled, and my viewership doesn't determine what medal they get. But I'd like to think that in a small way, my watching American Idol keeps the show going, and gives those truly talented people a chance.

About

A group blog exploring our media world. Produced by the Digital Journalism: Blogging course at New York University, Spring 2007.

Recent comments

Syndicate

Syndicate content

Navigation