Should NBC Have Released the Tape?

On Wednesday, NBC received a package from Cho Seung-Hui containing a video, several pictures, and a long note. NBC made the decision to release this material to the public, and the hateful video was shown on every newscast that night and the pictures were on the front page of every newspaper the next day.

But should this have ever been seen by the public?

It's a difficult question to answer. On one hand, it's breaking news, even if it is absolutely disgusting, and it's an important development in the story. It's sick and twisted that this package was mailed between the shootings, and the content gives the public some idea of what the killer was actually like. Plus, imagine the backlash that would've happened if the public learned later that this package was sent and the public was not informed.

But on the other hand, there needs to be some respect for the families of the victims. They are dealing with enough without being bombarded by this horrible video and these disturbing pictures of the man who killed their loved ones. My friend from high school's older brother was among the victims, and I can't even imagine what it must've been like for her and her family to see this video. There's a sensitivity chip that seems to be missing among the media.

I watched Anderson Cooper on Wednesday, and someone he was interviewing said they were worried that giving the video so much attention would lead to copycats, especially since Cho counted the Columbine shooters among his heroes.

Plus, showing the video over and over is giving him the attention that he wanted. He doesn't deserve that. It makes me absolutely sick that he thought of himself as some kind of martyr.

I don't know. I think that it should have been shown MAYBE once, and then dropped. In the hour-long news program that I watched the day the news broke, the video was shown at least four times. And then in morning, the front page of every newspaper had a huge picture of one of the many disturbing pictures the killer sent. Was that really necessary?

Finally, the networks have decided to cut back on airing this video. CNN and Fox have banned it completely, and NBC, CBS, and ABC will "severely limit" the usage. I'm glad they're doing this, but it's too late. The video has already been shown far more times than it ever should have been.

Katy Donoghue @ Fri, 04/20/2007 - 3:47pm

I think it's something that should have been released. It was mailed to NBC, and as I watched it being aired it was noted by the news anchor that NBC was regretfully doing exactly what the killer wished the news network to do. But did they need to keep playing it? No, but it had to be done nonetheless.

As far as copy-cat issues though, I think that there are bigger threats than a news coproration running the video. This kind of information cannot be kept from the public just because they are afraid someone might do the same...

melissah @ Sat, 04/21/2007 - 12:45am

I believe the media would have been irresponsible if they had not released the tape. Since I don't watch TV, I actually missed all the footage ad nauseam that news channels had been airing. It certainly has news value, but it also irks me that the footage has become so much of a contraband that days later, now it is impossible to find any of Cho's footage.

It certainly had news value and allows the world to better understand (sort of...) his actions.

The moment I heard about the shooting, the first question I asked my boyfriend was how many copycats he thought there would be. I'm biased in that I'm anti-censorship. If you take the argument that airing Cho's self-aggrandizing video will stir copycat massacres, then you could just as easily argue that merely reporting the V-Tech shooting will plant the idea of massacre in some impressionable mind, and also raise copycat shooters.

Andrea Feczko @ Sat, 04/21/2007 - 11:38am

I think the information needed to be given to the public. Because of his "manifesto", we now know that he was incredibly sick and understand his motives for the massacre. Understanding a person's reasons for doing this horrible crime is the only way to prevent it from happening.

But by information I do not mean showing the hateful video. It was unnecessary. The vital information from the "manifesto" could have been conveyed by the anchor with the still photos running on the screen.

Matt (not verified) @ Sat, 04/21/2007 - 2:07pm

Networks should have reported on the video/pictures without showing them (or maybe show one picture) and then refer people to their websites if they wanted more information. Everybody wins; people who don't want to see it don't have to, and the networks can generate traffic to their websites. My heart goes out to the families of the victims who were bombarded with these images and the hateful words of the killer.

Derick Vollrath @ Sat, 04/21/2007 - 6:32pm

I've got to say that I also think the information (at at root, that's what this video was) needed to be presented to the public. Many politicians and news media are already trying to spin this tragedy into a debate on larger issues (societal integration; gun control) and I think its important that the public be able to see these videos in order to understand these events for what they were: the act of a man who was clearly insane.

e banks @ Sun, 04/22/2007 - 2:20pm

when the zodiac killer was plaguing northern california, the san francisco examiner made sure his letters were put in the paper. this situation doesn't seem much different. while it may seem somewhat unethical to publish the works of a madman, especially when they want the attention, it's still necessary to release the information to the public. the video didn't necessarily have to be shown - it could have been an internet only component - but the info was definitely necessary.

Bianca Posterli @ Mon, 04/23/2007 - 12:01am

As much as I hate to say it, I think the news organizations had the right idea in showing this. I mean, it's news and that's why they are there...to inform the public. It's not like this is the first time the audience has seen disturbing pictures on TV. How many times did they show the Twin Towers fall in one day? My thoughts and prayers go out to all VT family and students, but unfortunatly for the college and all those involved, this is news.

~Bianca

About

A group blog exploring our media world. Produced by the Digital Journalism: Blogging course at New York University, Spring 2007.

Recent comments

Syndicate

Syndicate content

Navigation